Sunday, June 26, 2011

The value of an Art Jury...

So in my daily perusal of SoCal MLS listings, I saw one from -gasp- the Valley!  It reminded me of the utility of having an Art Jury - even a bad one - to prevent these cartoons from being built.  Please note this house is NOT NOT NOT located in Palos Verdes.  Its in Burbank actually.

(Source: MLS)

The home is currently listed for $1.5M on the MLS (listing can be found here).   Built in 2010, the The 4,500sf home sits on a 10,000sf lot and it   The "architectural design inspired by European style & elegance" - uh huh.  I've traveled a fair amount through Spain, France and Italy, and I don't recall seeing a concrete block wall topped with translucent plexiglass.  


What about those windows!  Builder special!  And the columns?  Petite.  Ah, and who can ignore the authentic banana colored stucco!  Oh Tuscany!  Wait folks - it gets better!


 (Source: MLS)


(Source: Google Maps)


How about that creative footprint - a box - and the siting of the home on the lot.  So much thought went into this.  And the balcony - look at those support columns - breathtaking.

What's more - this is yet another case of an investor/developer exploiting the land.  Here's what the site used to look like and what it looks like now:

(Source: Bing Maps)

(Source: Bing Maps)


Yep - that's right folks.  What was probably a 0.7 acre wooded lot has been transformed into a cram-as-many-homes-as-possible spec builder special.  No real room for a yard - just concrete and stucco.  All those great trees - gone.

(Source: Google Maps)

Best I can tell is that the developer bought the original lot for $1.4M in 2009 and tore down the old home, subdivided the lot, and built these three 4,500sf McMansions.  What a shame!

So as much as I complain about how the PVE Art Jury lets certain questionable homes (like this or this) slip through, at least they protect against the extremes.  

Thursday, June 23, 2011

A PVE Spanish Classic

Today, I'm writing about a home that is a bit of an enigma.  Not because its architectural fidelity is perplexing, but rather because I'm just not aware of the full history of the home.  The Melton Residence.





(Source: Google Maps)


Situated on a panoramic hilltop 18,510sf lot, this 4-bedroom 6-bath home spans a comfortable 5,310sf.  Public records show that this home was built in 1997 - however, I'm not sure if that is indeed correct.  The home itself wreaks of 1920s.  The exterior plaster finish.  The frames of the windows.  The siting of the home. I find it very surprising if a modern architect did indeed replicate - to this degree at least - all the features of the Spanish Revival style from the 20s.

 (Source: NJC)


(Source: Google Maps)

(Source: Google Maps)

The home itself is so elegant.   A balanced weight to the facade, with the main entrance slightly offset, but still positioned between two equally massed towers.  The casual wooden balcony makes the home look livable, comfortable - like an actual home.  The simple landscaping serves as merely a background to the star of the lot - the house.  The garage, tucked neatly to the side and behind, out of view from visitors.

The rear of the home is equally casual and well thought out.  Two levels of terraces, as well as an exterior staircase that bends down toward the paved courtyard.

Did I mention the view?  This home sits on a street called Via Panorama - and for good reason!  This is basically the view from the home:

(Source: NJC)

I wonder if the 1997 "year built" stat is in error, and really was the date the home went some sort of restoration or remodel.  Anyone know?

If only all new construction attempted to be as faithful to the Spanish style as this!


KEY STATS
Location: Montemalaga, PVE
Style: Spanish
Year built:  1997 (or is it???)
Architect: Unknown
Square footage: 5,310
Lot size: 18,510 (181' tapering to 91', x129' )

Sunday, June 19, 2011

A traditional home on the hill...

Today we're popping back over to PVE... where unlike the normal Spanish fare we see, I'm blogging about a Cape Cod home.  The Underberger Residence.

 (Source: NJC)

(Source: Don Thursby)


Built in 2009 and designed by Don Thursby, the 4,112sf home replaces a 2,661sf 1.5 story 1937 home.  The home sits on a cozy 9,600sf hilltop lot.  The owners bought the original home in 2001 for $1.725M.

 (Source: Bing Maps)


(Source: Google Maps)


The home itself, while quite nice aesthetically, does feel a little out of place.  For one thing, its surrounded by a host of red tile Mediterranean homes - in fact, it could very well be the only home in the neighborhood without a red tiled roof.

(Source: Google Maps)


Putting context aside for the moment, the home is quite nice.

 (Source: NJC)

(Source: NJC)

Great roof lines.  Wonderful garage doors.  White trimmed windows (and appropriately scaled!).  Once again showing that Mr. Thursby is a solid architect.  A very good example of the American/Cape Cod style.

But a home should fit in with its neighborhood - part of the fabric.   This  home, while itself very nice - does not fit into the Montemalaga neighborhood - it really belongs in Rolling Hills Estates or maybe the Valmonte neighborhood of PVE!


KEY STATS
Location: Montemalaga, PVE
Style: Cape Cod
Year built:  2009
Architect: Don Thursby
Square footage: 4,112
Lot size: 9,600sf (140'x70')

Monday, June 13, 2011

Densification alert 2!

Attention all my fellow anti-McMansioners!  Was perusing through several recent sales and wanted to draw folks' attention to these two lots:


 (Source: Google Maps)


(Source: County of LA)

I'm referring to the corner lot and the neighboring vacant lot which were purchased in December 2010 for $1.3M in Palos Verdes Estates' Lunada Bay neighborhood. The lots were purchased by developer John Katnik of Katnik Homes (/www.katnikhomes.com), who subsequently hired Doug Leach to design two homes for the two sites.

 The first lot, which totals a mere 6,600sf is comprised of the lot labeled 22 and a portion of the lot 21.  The other lot, which measures a tiny 5,000sf, is labeled 19 on the site plan above.

As you can see from the pictures, the first lot currently has a home on it - a nice, 1,590sf single story ranch built in 1953.

 (Source: MLS)

(Source: Google Maps)

(Source: Google Maps)

Public records show Katnik/Leach drew up plans to build a home on each of the lots.  In a bittersweet decision, plans for the lot which currently has a home on it were approved, while (thankfully!), plans for the vacant lot were denied.  Remember the guidelines I mentioned for building a new home in PVE from my previous post (which can be found here)?  Let's do some calculus here:

The second lot measures just over 5,000 square feet. So that means that the maximum first floor living area is 1,050 plus a 450 square foot garage.  The maximum living area that could be built is 2,050sf (1,050sf on first floor, 1,000sf on second floor), meaning that the second floor would have a first floor coverage ratio of 67% - which would present several challenges for massing.  Do the economics on this project (lot #2)  work?  Let's see:
- Land cost $579K (5,000sf/11,600sf x $1.3M)
- City fees/permits + architect fees: $75K
- Construction cost: $625K ($250 x 2,500sf)

Our total is $1.28M.  If we gross up for 6% realtor commissions, that comes to $1.36M or approximately $664 per finished square foot.  Who would pay almost $1.4M for a 2,050sf home with a small back yard?

I don't know why Katnik doesn't just join the two lots to form a nice, expansive 11,600sf lot on which he could build a comfortable 4,500sf home with a huge backyard?  It would be more in keeping with the character of the city and immediate neighborhood.  Let's hope the city officials stick to their guns and prevent the further densification of PVE!

If you'd like to express your opposition to City Council or the Planning Commission, here are the relevant contacts:
City Council:  Citycouncil@pvestates.org
Planning Commission: arigg@pvestates.org


KEY STATS
Location: 1616 Addison Rd & 36 Margate Square, Lunada Bay, PVE
Style: TBD
Year built:  2011 (proposed)
Architect: Doug Leach
Square footage: TOO BIG!
Lot size: 11,600sf

Sunday, June 12, 2011

French Country in Rolling Hills Estates

I must admit I do give a disproportionate amount of attention to Palos Verdes Estates - more so than to neighboring Rolling Hills Estates, Rolling Hills and Rancho Palos Verdes.  So today, in an effort to balance things out a bit, I bring you a brand spankin' new home built on a beautiful lot in horse-loving Rolling Hills Estates.  RHE as you'll recall, isn't the gated Rolling Hills community - rather this is a non-gated community that borders PVE, RH, Torrance and Lomita.  It's centered around the equestrian lifestyle and marked by the white fences that line the streets and homes in the city.  Like neighboring PVE, RHE has its own country club and it also has a very strict neighborhood compatibility and planning commission process for getting new homes built.  Unlike PVE however, there is no formal art jury or architectural review board to approve the aesthetics of a new home.  That said, the city's planning commission and approval process does take into account the compatibility of the proposed home with its surroundings - you'll find very few if any Spanish or Italian homes built in RHE.  Rather, the architecture of choice is the California Ranch.  Occasionally, a country (American or European) style of home, with hints of the ranch vernacular, will pop up, as in the case of the home I'm writing about now.

(Source: MLS)


Designed by local architect George Sweeney and built this year, this 5,400 square foot French Country-style home sits on a lush 0.47 acre lot in Rolling Hills Estates.   The lot, at 130 feet wide, is 182 feet deep and features a guest house as well.

(Source: MLS)
(Source: MLS)


This home replaces a 1963-built 2,508 single level ranch style home that was in serious disrepair.  The current owners bought the original home in 2004 for $975K, then transferred it to an LLC in 2009 while going through the city's permitting process.  The new home is on the market for $4.0M.

 (Source: Google Maps)

(Source: Bing Maps)

As you can see from the photos above, the old home and lot was overgrown with vegetation and in serious need of an update (look at the driveway!).  The new home is - quite simply - gorgeous!  While I'm generally not a fan of French Country or Tudor, this home delivers on detail and authenticity.

 (Source: Bing Maps)

(Source: Google Maps)

Where to start.  The garage - I love how the garage is tucked off to the side - not visible from the street.  The new home opts for a single driveway rather than the previous homes semi-circular driveway.  The front yard is tidy, keeping intact a large mature tree, and opting for a simple grass yard rather than overgrown bush.  The facade is balanced, restrained, understated.  It fits.  Massing is modest, and while this home is more than twice the square footage of the previous home, somehow this seems to blend better into its surroundings.

Moving to the rear yard, the pool was moved and a full landscape renovation was undertaken.  Guest house? Check.  Pool? check.  Trees and hedges? Check.  And how about the rear facade!  Well done!  Alternating rooflines.  Wooden accents.  Scaled windows.  Bravo!

Overall, a very well executed home.  Perfect addition to the street and RHE.


KEY STATS
Location: PV Dr N, RHE
Style: French
Year built:  2011
Architect: George Sweeney
Square footage: 5,400
Lot size: 20,580  (130'x182')

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Densification alert! Community unite!

So I just came across a new listing on the MLS in PVE.  It is a 1954 built 2,367sf single level ranch that sits on a double lot - that is, two lots the original owner bought and joined together to build this home.  The home, which sits on a 12,450sf lot, is listed at $1M, although sources tell me that the listing agent has received several offers over asking price.

(Source: JM)

(Source: Google Maps)


So as you can see, what I like about this home is that it is very wide!  120 feet wide in the front, tapering to approximately 102 in the rear.  However, it is a very shallow lot - an average of 110 feet deep.

The home itself, as I'm told by realtor friends, needs a lot of work.  Around $200-300K worth of updates and repairs.  I worry that someone would buy this home, and then unjoin the lots to build two smaller homes on the two legal parcels underlying the current ranch home.  Per PVE guidlines, each home would be limited by the following:
- Building lot coverage of no more than 30% of the lot (e.g. first floor plus garage)
- Total square footage (including garage) cannot exceed the LESSER of 1,750sf + 30% of the lot or 50% of the total lot area.

So with these guidelines in mind, assuming that the lots are roughly equal in size (6,225sf), we're limited to the following potential single family dwellings on each of the lot:
- First floor living space of 1,427sf (1,867sf building area, less 440sf for the two-car garage)
- Maximum living space of 2,672sf (3,112sf less 440sf garage)

That is the maximum allowed for the lots.  Now using some common sense, based on the math above, 3,112sf less 1867sf for the first floor, leaves 1,245sf for the second floor - or roughly 67% coverage over the first floor.  Given aesthetic guidelines on massing, it's hard to see the Art Jury or Planning Commission allowing someone to build a second story that's 2/3 the footprint of the house.


(Source: County of LA)


Next question: do the economics make sense?  Let's see:
- Assumed land cost of $600K each ($1.2M divided by two lots)
- Architect fees of $50K
- City fees and permits: $50K
- Build cost of $778K (3,112 @ $250/sf )

That totals approximately $1.478M or $553 per finished square foot of living space. Again, if we factor realtor's 6% commissions, our breakeven selling price, on a square foot basis), would be $588/sf.  A quick search of PVE MLS shows that houses built after 2000 (so last 10 years) are listed for sale between $513/sf and 842/sf.  Recent sales (last 6 months) show a range of $509/sf to $899/sf (although the higher range is accounted for by larger lots and ocean views, which this property will not have).

So this would be risky for someone to take on.  The homes themselves would be relatively small for someone looking to spend $1.5-2.0M.

What would I like to see?  I would love it if someone built their dream estate on this parcel.  I've even taken the liberty of drawing up a floorplan and some inspiration photos for what this estate might look like:

(Source: NJC)

The floorplan conforms to PVE guidelines (lot coverage, front, side and rear setbacks, etc).  I've omitted my second floor designs, but you get the idea.  This floorplan takes advantage of the wide but shallow lot.  It keeps the formal entertaining space away from the 'lived in' part of the house, and it also maximizes views of the backyard and side courtyard.    Also, using this L-shaped floorplan not only creates a lovely courtyard, it also creates the maximum usability for the back yard.  Had I opted for the normal rectangle, the backyard would have been wider (100') but very shallow (30-40').  Here, the backyard is very usable - about 60' wide, and about 65' deep.  In terms of the feel of the various spaces, here are some 'inspiration photos:'

Facade:



Rear facade:

Interiors:





Courtyard:




Here's to hoping the new owner does the lot justice!  Fingers crossed!

.